Category Archives: Let All Things Be Decent and In Order

Fox News practice democracy allowing all 20 GOP presidential candidates participate in the debate “Yet KABC-7 & NBC4LA “DID NOT” allow the People see & hear all the Mayoral candidates 2013 Televised Debate. TV Media Controls L.A., CA

cropped-addiemaemiller-11Addie M. Miller, believes it is a total disgrace and a “terrible dishonor” to the United States of America and the people, when Walt Disney Co.-ABC Holding Co. that owns television network KABC-7 and Owners NBC Universal NBC and NBC4LA television network, that purposely denied the voters to hear and see who were ‘actually the certified official candidates for Mayor of the City of Los Angeles’ on their televised held in Los Angeles, CA for 2013 primary election.

Yet, the Republican presidential primary debate hosted by Fox News at 5 p.m. on Aug. 6, 2015 in Cleveland, Ohio all 20 GOP presidental candidates were allowed to participate.

 

Fox News executive Michael Clemente has sincerely practice democracy, by allowing all 20 GOP presidential candidates be heard and to participate in the debate, that was aired Thur., August 6, 2015. He was very respectful to the Voters of the United States. Michael Clemente divided the debates into two.

The announcement by Fox News executive Michael Clemente means low-polling candidates who might not make the 1% level.
Fox News is gifted to have an executive who my no means wants manipulate the voters. Thank you Mr. Michael Clemente.

It is a disgrace and a “terrible dishonor” to the United States of America and the people, when Walt Disney Co.-ABC Holding Co. that owns television network KABC7 and Owners NBC Universal NBC and NBC4LA television network, that purposely denied the voters to hear who were actually candidates on their televised in Los Angeles, CA for 2013 election.

Over 50 years ABC and NBC has been manipulating the voters and having the power to choose who ABC and NBC want to win and be heard. In my opinion and research ABC and NBC television networks has over thrown the government with this unlawful and treason practice

Sometimes, I wonder do these JUDGES have interest or/stock in ABC and NBC, whereas the Judges allowed these corporations “ABC and NBC” to violate the People of the United States.

Isn’t it a conflict of interest for a Judge to decide a case against a corporation, if the Judge has or had personal/financial dealings with the corporation(s)?

Mr. Michael Clemente please continue to honor the people will, thank you again. May GOD continue to bless you.

Sincerely from, Addie M. Miller

The following is a transcript of the Republican presidential primary debate hosted by Fox News at 5 p.m. on Aug. 6, 2015 in Cleveland, Ohio.

SPEAKERS:
Rk Candidate
1 Jeb Bush
2 Mike Huckabee
3 Scott Walker
4 Ted Cruz
5 Ben Carson
6 Rand Paul
8 Donald Trump
9 Chris Christie
10 John Kasich
Source: Real Clear Politics
Note: Numbers as of Aug 4, 2015. *Change in ranking from previous week
FORMER GOV. RICK PERRY, R-TEXAS
FORMER SEN. RICK SANTORUM, R-PA.
SEN. LINDSEY GRAHAM, R-S.C.
GOV. BOBBY JINDAL, R-LA.
CARLY FIORINA
FORMER GOV. JIM GILMORE, R-GA.
FORMER GOV. GEORGE PATAKI, R-N.Y.

Addie M. Miller, believes it is a total disgrace and a “terrible dishonor” to the United States of America and the people, when Walt Disney Co.-ABC Holding Co. that owns television network KABC-7 and Owners NBC Universal NBC and NBC4LA television network, that purposely denied the voters to hear who were actually candidates certified official candidates for Mayor of the City of Los Angeles’on their televised debates for Los Angeles, CA for 2013 primary election.
Advertisements

Civil and Political Rights are a Class of Rights that Protect Individuals’ Freedom from Unwarranted Infringement

“Civil rights” redirects here. For other uses, see Civil rights (disambiguation).

Civil and political rights are a class of rights that protect individualsfreedom from unwarranted infringement by governments and private organizations, and ensure one’s ability to participate in the civil and political life of the state without discrimination or repression.

Civil rights include the ensuring of peoples’ physical and mental integrity, life and safety; protection from discrimination on grounds such as race, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, national origin, color, ethnicity, religion, or disability;[1][2][3] and individual rights such as privacy, the freedoms of thought and conscience, speech and expression, religion, the press, assembly and movement.

For Referencehttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_and_political_rights

https://addiemmiller.wordpress.com/2018/07/11/a-supreme-court-justice-of-the-united-states-must-recuse-from-case-when-justices-has-financial-interest-in-case/
https://addiemmiller.wordpress.com/2018/07/10/injustice-in-my-opinion-the-supreme-court-of-the-united-states-cases-distributed-for-conference-were-not-being-treated-fairly-clerk-stated-justices-can-see-all-cases-in-one-day
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/economy/conflict-interest-supreme-court-justices-stocks
https://www.facebook.com/addie.m.miller/posts/1689305707854828
                            https://dockets.justia.com/docket/california/cacdce/2:2014cv06472/597116

Addie M. Miller v. Walt Disney Company Channel 7 KABC et al

Plaintiff: Addie M. Miller

Defendant: Walt Disney Company Channel 7 KABC and NBC4LA-Telemundo

Case Number: 2:2014cv06472

Filed: August 18, 2014

Court: California Central District Court

Presiding Judge: Unassigned

Referring Judge: Duty Magistrate Judge

Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other

MY CASE IS IN SUCH LARGE GROUP SCHEDULED FOR CONFERENCE AT THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES ON SEPTEMBER 29, 2014, “WILL MY CASE #13-9007 RECEIVE ‘FAIR ATTENTION AND A FAIR DECISION” BY THE 9 UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT JUSTICES??” (Read the following)

Today July 10, 2014 a 9:56 A.M. I telephoned the Supreme Court of the United States to inquire my concern regarding to the ‘numerous’ Distribution of Cases for Conference before the Justices on September 29, 2014.

INJUSTICE!! In My Opinion, The Supreme Court Of The United States “Cases Distributed for Conference Were Not being Treated Fairly. “Clerk” stated, “Justices can see all cases in one day”.

I ask the clerk is it possible for the Justices to review all these cases in ONE DAY? He answered YES.  My case did not receive Fair Attention and did Not Receive Fair Decision.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=%2Fdocketfiles%2F13-9007.htm

“JUSTICES” OF SUPREME COURT OF THE UNTIED STATES, MUST OBEY THE CONSTITUTION AND “NOT THEIR PERSONAL FRIENDS AND BUSINESS ACQUAINTANCES”, CONCERNING ANY CASE THAT COME BEFORE THE S.C.O.T.U.S.

https://www.myenglishpages.com/site…/random-idiom.php…
JUSTICE IS BLIND. “-This expression means that justice is impartial and objective. There is an allusion here to the Greek statue for justice, wearing a blindfold so as “not to treat friends differently from strangers”, or “rich people better than the poor ones.”

No automatic alt text available.

2018 Happy Independence Day

Remember what USA stands for. Peace Be Still. God loves and create all.

ADDIE MILLER STEPPED IN AND STOPPED THE SHUT DOWN of U.S.C. MEDICAL CENTER

https://www.newspapers.com/newspage/155317119/

Now, the County U.S.C. Medical Center , currently known NOW as Keck Medical Center is the largest Medical Center in Los Angeles, CA.  During the time I wrote this article U.S.C. Medical Center was going to be shut down. Now, today with the help of the Keck Foundation it is the most most modern and advance Medical Center and the buildings are gorgeous with beautiful landscapes.   I, also made a public statement during the Board of Supervisors meeting to please do not shut down U.S.C. Medical Center.                  Addie Miller wrote an article published in the Los Angeles Times Newspaper  “City Times Voices”     July 23, 1995    The Los Angeles Times from Los Angeles, California · Page 378    Publication:    The Los Angeles Times i     Location:     Los Angeles, California  Issue Date:  Sunday, July 23, 1995

https://www.newspapers.com/newspage/155317119/

15 Clear Signs Your Phone Was Hacked VITAL INFORMATION

Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986 (ECPA), 18 U.S. Code § 2510 – Definitions,

U.S. Code › Title 18 › Part I › Chapter 119 › § 2510

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2510

https://cyber.harvard.edu/privacy/18usc2510-2521.htm

https://it.ojp.gov/PrivacyLiberty/authorities/statutes/1285

(a) Every person who, with intent to place another person in reasonable fear for his or her safety, or the safety of the other person’s immediate family, by means of an electronic communication device, and without consent of the other person, and for the purpose of imminently causing that other person unwanted physical contact, injury, or harassment, by a third party, electronically distributes, publishes, e-mails, hyperlinks, or makes available for downloading, personal identifying information, including, but not limited to, a digital image of another person, or an electronic message of a harassing nature about another person, which would be likely to incite or produce that unlawful action, is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by up to one year in a county jail, by a fine of not more than one thousand dollars ($1,000), or by both that fine and imprisonment.

 

(b) For purposes of this section, “electronic communication device” includes, but is not limited to, telephones, cell phones, computers, Internet Web pages or sites, Internet phones, hybrid cellular/Internet/wireless devices, personal digital assistants (PDAs), video recorders, fax machines, or pagers. “Electronic communication” has the same meaning as the term is defined in; 

Section 2510(12) of Title 18 of the United States Code 

(c) For purposes of this section, the following terms apply:

(1) “Harassment” means a knowing and willful course of conduct directed at a specific person that a reasonable person would consider as seriously alarming, seriously annoying, seriously tormenting, or seriously terrorizing the person and that serves no legitimate purpose.

(2) “Of a harassing nature” means of a nature that a reasonable person would consider as seriously alarming, seriously annoying, seriously tormenting, or seriously terrorizing of the person and that serves no legitimate purpose.