Afro-Americans/Blacks are victims of DERACINATION “forced Displacement” is taking place in the City of Los Angeles. REMOVAL OF PEOPLE FROM ONE AREA TO ANOTHER IS A CRIME AGAINST HUMANITY”
Forced displacement or forced immigration is the coerced movement of a person or people away from their home or home region and it often connotes violent coercion. Someone who has experienced forced displacement is a “forced immigrant”, a “displaced person” (DP), rarely also a “displacee”, or if it is within the same country, an internally displaced person (IDP). In some cases the forced immigrant can also become a refugee, as that term has a specific legal definition. A specific form of forced displacement is population transfer, which is a coherent policy to move unwanted groups, for example, as an attempt at ethnic cleansing. Another form is deportation.
Addie M. Miller’s Divine Mission is Promoting and Advertising the “CLEANING-UP” starting with the MEDIA MANIPULATION OF THE VOTERS & CONCEALMENT OF INFORMATION TO THE VOTERS.
Former Los Angeles Councilman Nate Holden, stated during council meeting, the election process in the City of Los Angeles is reminiscent of Chicago style politics, further we don’t want Chicago style politics in the City of Los Angeles, Quoted by former Nate Holden and Councilman Rudy Svorinich, Jr.
In my opinion the 2013 primary election was Chicago style politics by the television Media here in the City of Los Angeles.
Addie M. Miller, believes it is a total disgrace and a “terrible dishonor” to the United States of America and the people, when Walt Disney Co.-ABC Holding Co. that owns television network KABC-7 and Owners NBC Universal NBC and NBC4LA television network, that purposely denied the voters to hear and see who were ‘actually the certified official candidates for Mayor of the City of Los Angeles’ on their televised held in Los Angeles, CA for 2013 primary election.
Yet, the Republican presidential primary debate hosted by Fox News at 5 p.m. on Aug. 6, 2015 in Cleveland, Ohio all 20 GOP presidental candidates were allowed to participate.
Fox News executive Michael Clemente has sincerely practice democracy, by allowing all 20 GOP presidential candidates be heard and to participate in the debate, that was aired Thur., August 6, 2015. He was very respectful to the Voters of the United States. Michael Clemente divided the debates into two.
The announcement by Fox News executive Michael Clemente means low-polling candidates who might not make the 1% level.
Fox News is gifted to have an executive who my no means wants manipulate the voters. Thank you Mr. Michael Clemente.
It is a disgrace and a “terrible dishonor” to the United States of America and the people, when Walt Disney Co.-ABC Holding Co. that owns television network KABC7 and Owners NBC Universal NBC and NBC4LA television network, that purposely denied the voters to hear who were actually candidates on their televised in Los Angeles, CA for 2013 election.
Over 50 years ABC and NBC has been manipulating the voters and having the power to choose who ABC and NBC want to win and be heard. In my opinion and research ABC and NBC television networks has over thrown the government with this unlawful and treason practice
Sometimes, I wonder do these JUDGES have interest or/stock in ABC and NBC, whereas the Judges allowed these corporations “ABC and NBC” to violate the People of the United States.
Isn’t it a conflict of interest for a Judge to decide a case against a corporation, if the Judge has or had personal/financial dealings with the corporation(s)?
Mr. Michael Clemente please continue to honor the people will, thank you again. May GOD continue to bless you.
Sincerely from, Addie M. Miller
The following is a transcript of the Republican presidential primary debate hosted by Fox News at 5 p.m. on Aug. 6, 2015 in Cleveland, Ohio.
1 Jeb Bush
2 Mike Huckabee
3 Scott Walker
4 Ted Cruz
5 Ben Carson
6 Rand Paul
8 Donald Trump
9 Chris Christie
10 John Kasich
Source: Real Clear Politics
Note: Numbers as of Aug 4, 2015. *Change in ranking from previous week
FORMER GOV. RICK PERRY, R-TEXAS
FORMER SEN. RICK SANTORUM, R-PA.
SEN. LINDSEY GRAHAM, R-S.C.
GOV. BOBBY JINDAL, R-LA.
FORMER GOV. JIM GILMORE, R-GA.
FORMER GOV. GEORGE PATAKI, R-N.Y.
Speak your mind, no landlord/staff or any other person is to make a Subliminal Threat, an “expression of intention to inflict evil, injury, or damage towards you because you post a copy of a news article.” Are they are guilty what is written in the news article stated?? I believe this is why these perpetrators continue to violate the law.
Yes, they can manipulate their followers (staff) to go against you, but remember you are helping other new or potential victims. These perpetrators probably been getting by with this sort horrendous, extremely unpleasant, horrifying acts of for years!!
You are not alone, you may contact the MeToo Movement at https://metoomvmt.org
“Civil rights” redirects here. For other uses, see Civil rights (disambiguation).
Civil and political rights are a class of rights that protect individuals‘ freedom from unwarranted infringement by governments and private organizations, and ensure one’s ability to participate in the civil and political life of the state without discrimination or repression.
Civil rights include the ensuring of peoples’ physical and mental integrity, life and safety; protection from discrimination on grounds such as race, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, national origin, color, ethnicity, religion, or disability; and individual rights such as privacy, the freedoms of thought and conscience, speech and expression, religion, the press, assembly and movement.
For Reference: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_and_political_rights
Addie M. Miller v. Walt Disney Company Channel 7 KABC et al
Plaintiff: Addie M. Miller
Defendant: Walt Disney Company Channel 7 KABC and NBC4LA-Telemundo
Case Number: 2:2014cv06472
Filed: August 18, 2014
Court: California Central District Court
Presiding Judge: Unassigned
Referring Judge: Duty Magistrate Judge
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
MY CASE IS IN SUCH LARGE GROUP SCHEDULED FOR CONFERENCE AT THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES ON SEPTEMBER 29, 2014, “WILL MY CASE #13-9007 RECEIVE ‘FAIR ATTENTION AND A FAIR DECISION” BY THE 9 UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT JUSTICES??” (Read the following)
Today July 10, 2014 a 9:56 A.M. I telephoned the Supreme Court of the United States to inquire my concern regarding to the ‘numerous’ Distribution of Cases for Conference before the Justices on September 29, 2014.
The Above Photo Are The 9 Supreme Court Justices to whom my CASE #13-9007 went before 7/21/2014 .
My Case as the petitioner #13-9007 was Distributed For Conference in the Supreme Court Of The United States 4/23/2014 and was denied 7/21/2014.
I personally telephoned the Supreme Court to ask that there were many, many cases schedules for Conference that day and did the Justices take time to review my CASE #13-9007.
I have a question “Did the Justices take there time to actually review?” After reading PBS.Org, I believe there is a conflict of interest with the Justice(s) and the Respondent as far as having stock in the Respondent’s corporation, then I believe the Justice should have recuse themselves from my case #13-9007.
In my opinion unfairness towards my case #13-9007 during the 7/21/2014 Justices Supreme Court Of The United States Conference.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=%2Fdocketfiles%2F13-9007.htm A Justice(s) of the Supreme Court of the United States must recuse themselves from a case when the Justice(s) has financial interest a party. In my opinion when my case went before the Supreme Court their was a financial interest with the party I was suing. I also believe there was more than one justice and that is why my case was never heard.
Government of the people, by the people, for the people……- Abraham Lincoln
The Supreme Court Of The United States should not just be for the Rich Corporations. Such a Great INJUSTICE.
The 9 Supreme Court Of The United States in the years 2013 , 2014 and 2015
The Supreme Court’s 2012-2013 term made history by striking down key elements of the Voting Rights Act and the Defense of Marriage Act, both in 5 to 4 decisions. The percentage of 5-to-4 split cases this session was the court’s highest since 2008, with Justice Anthony M. Kennedy most frequently voting with the majority. In the three major cases that ended the court’s term — affirmative action in higher education, the Voting Rights Act and the Defense of Marriage Act —Kennedy was the only justice in the majority each time.
- 10 decisions aligned with the conservative block
- 6 decisions aligned with the
- 3 decisions consisted of Roberts, Thomas, Alito, Kennedy and Breyer
- 1 consisted of Roberts, Scalia, Breyer, Ginsburg and Kagan
- 1 consisted of Scalia, Kennedy, Ginsburg, Sotomayor and Kagan
- 1 consisted of Scalia, Thomas, Ginsburg, Sotomayor and Kagan
- 1 consisted of Thomas, Breyer, Ginsburg, Sotomayor and Kagan