“TRAIL OF TEARS 2015” LACK OF ACTION TO COMBAT THE HOMELESSNESS IN CALIFORNIA

Addie M. Miller

                                                          

“TRAIL OF TEARS’ 2015”  

HISTORY REPEATS

     WHY  HAS  IT BEEN SUCH A LACK OF ACTION

        TO COMBAT THE HOMELESSNESS IN CALIFORNIA

PRESS RELEASE

                                                                                                            By: Addie M. Miller

Deracination is a crime against humanity. Force removal is a crime against humanity, even if it is market driven economics.

Forced to live homeless and forced to live in poverty.

Forced migration (also called deracination — originally a French word meaning uprooting) refers to the coerced movement of a person or persons away from their home or home region. Migrating in the same country means the person is an Internally Displaced Person (or IDP). It often connotes violent coercion, and is used interchangeably with the terms “displacement” or forced displacement

The L.A. Times’ article dated September 22, 2015 ‘L.A. To declare ‘state of emergency’ on homelessness’

“It’s time to get real, because this is literally a matter of life and death,” said Councilman Mike Bonin, whose Westside district is home to many of the makeshift sidewalk encampments that are an increasingly glaring symbol of the problem across the city. He spoke of a “collective failure of every level of government to deal with what has been a homeless crisis for generations and is exploding and exacerbating now.”

Acknowledging their failure to stem a surge in homelessness, Los Angeles’ elected leaders on Tuesday said they would declare a “state of emergency” and devote up to $100 million to the problem. But they offered few details about where the money would come from or how it would be spent, leaving some to question the effort’s chances of success.

L.A. to declare ‘state of emergency’ on homelessness, commit $100 million

Some lawmakers assert that their proposed declaration — which the council must still vote to approve — would allow the city to ease restrictions on churches and nonprofit groups sheltering the homeless and speed up the permitting process for builders of affordable housing. They pointed to a state law that allows the city to declare a “shelter crisis” and use public facilities such as parks or schools as emergency housing.

COPY AND PASTE THE FOLLOWING TO READ http://www.latimes.com/…/la-me-ln-homeless-funding-proposal…

Written by; Peter Jamison, David Zahniser and Matt Hamilton L. A. Times Reporters

TRAIL OF TEARS”

The homelessness in Los Angeles is similar and a repeat of the “Indian Genocide”. Trail_of_Tears

The relocated peoples suffered from exposure, disease, and starvation while enroute, and many died before reaching their various destinations.

The Trail of Tears was a series of forced relocations of Native American nations in the United States following the Indian Removal Act of 1830. The removal included members of the Cherokee, Muscogee, Seminole, Chickasaw, and Choctaw nations, from their ancestral homelands in the southeastern U.S. to an area west of the Mississippi River that had been designated as Indian Territory. The phrase “Trail of Tears” originated from a description of the removal of the Choctaw Nation in 1831.[1]

Between 1830 and 1850, the Chickasaw, Choctaw, Muscogee, Creek, Seminole and Cherokee peoples (including European Americans and African American freedmen and slaves who lived among them) were forcibly removed from their traditional lands and relocated further west.

           CALIFORNIA UNFRIENDLY TO SENIOR CITIZENS

Senior Citizens are being told by management of properties there is a 3 to 10 years Waiting Lists or Waiting List is ‘closed’ to obtain permanent residence

The Baby Boomer generation are Senior Citizens now. Does THIS mean that seniors will have to wait 3 o 10 years to obtain a permanent residence or is this a way to eliminate the population? Is the government intending to increase the homelessness in Los Angeles when seniors are in need permanent housing.

Rent prices are very high which makes it impossible for a Low or Middle Income to rent a permanent resident in Los Angeles.

The homeless/Senior Citizens are being taken advantage of by people who charge 80% of a person income just for a bed. Making the person unable to buy food and other necessary items they are in need of for the month.

In my opinion this is DERACINATION the uprooting and forced displacement of one group by another, especially, better than 80% of the homeless population are black.

Submitted by,

Addie M. Miller

THE FOLLOWING ARE REFERENCES:

FORCING WHOLE POPULATION TO MOVE IS A CRIME https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forced_migration

DERACINATE UPROOT https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forced_migration

TRAIL_OF_TEARS https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trail_of_Tears

– FBI efforts against election crimes today FBI.gov 08/06/2015

Corruption in the election process ‘voter manipulation’ is critical and “has been for over a HALF A CENTURY.

addiemmiller

Federal Bureau of InvestigationFederal Bureau of InvestigationFederal Bureau of Investigation 

HomeNewsStories2015AugustByte Out of History
  Byte Out of History

A look at the FBI’s involvement in an early election fraud case.

Byte Out of History
FBI Involvement in Early Election Fraud Case in Kansas City

08/06/15

Impartial and fair elections are the cornerstone of any democracy, and the FBI has a long history of investigating illegal activities that harm the elective process.

One of our earliest investigations involved Kansas City political fixer Tom Pendergast, who was threatened by the basic workings of democratic elections—in particular, by any election that didn’t go his way. In the 1920s and 1930s, Pendergast, a former alderman…

View original post 598 more words

– FBI efforts against election crimes today FBI.gov 08/06/2015

Federal Bureau of InvestigationFederal Bureau of InvestigationFederal Bureau of Investigation 

Home News Stories 2015 August Byte Out of History
  Byte Out of History

A look at the FBI’s involvement in an early election fraud case.

Byte Out of History
FBI Involvement in Early Election Fraud Case in Kansas City

08/06/15

Impartial and fair elections are the cornerstone of any democracy, and the FBI has a long history of investigating illegal activities that harm the elective process.

One of our earliest investigations involved Kansas City political fixer Tom Pendergast, who was threatened by the basic workings of democratic elections—in particular, by any election that didn’t go his way. In the 1920s and 1930s, Pendergast, a former alderman, ran the political machine that controlled the electoral choices in Kansas City, Missouri, and he got rich in the process. Because of Pendergast’s corrupt activities—including voter fraud and bribery—Kansas City became known as an open city where gangsters moved freely and prostitution, gambling, and drug enterprises flourished.

And, of course, election fraud flourished as well, along with its accompanying scare tactics. The 1934 primary election in Kansas City had been so violent that it became known as the “Bloody Election,” with thugs connected to the Pendergast machine committing acts of violence and intimidation against opponents and voters across the city. The fraudulent reporting of election results was even more damaging to the democratic process—precincts returned astronomical participation rates. Vote totals for machine candidates (Pendergast’s picks) even exceeded the total population in several wards and precincts.

Tired of Pendergast’s tight-fisted control of their city, a coalition of his opponents banded together for 1936 municipal elections and attempted to throw Pendergast’s supporters out of office. But that was not to be, at least not right away.

For the spring primary, fraud appeared to be the order of the day. U.S. Attorney Maurice Milligan of the Western District of Missouri later wrote that in one city ward, the vote ratio was 1,045 to 1, and in another, the ratio was 1,469 to 1—both in favor of the machine candidates. The sheer size of the margins suggested a serious problem.

In anticipation of the 1936 general election in the fall, Milligan called for a grand jury to convene and began to gather information. A federal judge from the district agreed, saying that there was “a crying need for the purification of the ballot in America” and authorizing Milligan to seize electoral records after the counts were submitted to investigate possible fraud. It would be the U.S. Marshals’ job to gather and secure the evidence and the FBI’s job to help analyze this voluminous material and collect additional evidence in the case.

On election morning, the Pendergast political machine was out in full force. Voting proceeded throughout the day and election officials tallied, recorded, reported, and sealed the records as they were supposed to. But at that point, the U.S. Marshals stepped in and claimed the records under grand jury warrant. By 8 p.m. that night, truckloads of ballots and other records—12 tons worth—were carted to the federal building in Kansas City and FBI agents began to examine them.

FBI Agent Charles Appel, the founder of the Bureau’s Technical Laboratory, was point man, as his expertise was forensic document examination. The first bag opened revealed that at least 95 ballots had been tampered with. Further analysis showed such fraud and other tinkering were systemic.

The first federal indictments for voter fraud were leveled in January 1937, and by the middle of 1938, 242 people had either pled guilty or been convicted at trial. Of those who chose to go to trial, they were convicted by juries of their peers—who perhaps were sending a message that corruption would no longer be tolerated in Kansas City.

Of course, Pendergast himself appeared unscathed at first, but his political machine was severely damaged. And these first cracks in his organization led to other challenges to his rule. Eventually, agents of the Internal Revenue Service were able to gather evidence against Pendergast on tax evasion charges related to a large kickback he had received, and the boss’ rule was ended by a guilty plea and a stint in the Leavenworth federal penitentiary.

Resources:
FBI efforts against election crimes today

Rampant Corporatism: SCOTUS Justices Rule in Favor of Companies they Own Stock In, 90% of the Time

News Feed

Nearly 90 percent of the time, supreme court justices sided with businesses that filed ‘friend of the court’ briefs, a new report finds.
thefreethoughtproject.com

FOX NEWS EXECUTIVE MICHAEL CLEMENTE ALLOWED ALL 20 CANDIDATES TO PARTICIPATE IN DEBATE 8/6/2015, MR. MICHAEL CLEMENTE HAS RE-ESTABLISHED DEMOCRACY!

Republican presidential primary debate hosted by Fox News at 5 p.m. on Aug. 6, 2015 in Cleveland, Ohio.

Fox News executive Michael Clemente has sincerely practice democracy, by allowing all 20 GOP presidential candidates be heard and to participate in the debate, that was aired Thur., August 6, 2015. He was very respectful to the Voters of the United States.

Michael Clemente divided the debates into two to make it possible for ALL candidates to speak.

The announcement by Fox News executive Michael Clemente means low-polling candidates who might not make the 1% level.

Fox News is gifted to have an executive who my no means wants manipulate the voters. Thank you Mr. Michael Clemente.

It is a disgrace and a “terrible dishonor” to the United States of America and the people, when Walt Disney Co.-ABC Holding Co. that owns television network KABC7 and Owners NBC Universal NBC and NBC4LA television network, that purposely denied the voters to hear who were actually candidates on their televised in Los Angeles, CA for 2013 election.

Over 50 years ABC and NBC has been manipulating the voters and having the power to choose who ABC and NBC want to win and be heard.

In my opinion and research ABC and NBC television networks has over thrown the government with this unlawful and treason practice

Sometimes, I wonder do these JUDGES have interest or/stock in ABC and NBC, whereas the Judges allow these corporations “ABC and NBC” to violate the People of the United States.

Isn’t it a conflict of interest for a Judge to decide a case against a corporation, if the Judge has or had personal/financial dealings with the corporation(s)?

Mr. Michael Clemente please continue to honor the people will, thank you again. May GOD continue to bless you.

Sincerely from, Addie M. Miller

The following is a transcript of the Republican presidential primary debate hosted by Fox News at 5 p.m. on Aug. 6, 2015 in Cleveland, Ohio.

SPEAKERS:
Rk Candidate
1 Jeb Bush
2 Mike Huckabee
3 Scott Walker
4 Ted Cruz
5 Ben Carson
6 Rand Paul
8 Donald Trump
9 Chris Christie
10 John Kasich
Source: Real Clear Politics
Note: Numbers as of Aug 4, 2015. *Change in ranking from previous week
FORMER GOV. RICK PERRY, R-TEXAS
FORMER SEN. RICK SANTORUM, R-PA.
SEN. LINDSEY GRAHAM, R-S.C.
GOV. BOBBY JINDAL, R-LA.
CARLY FIORINA
FORMER GOV. JIM GILMORE, R-GA.
FORMER GOV. GEORGE PATAKI, R-N.Y.

2017, United States, Elder Abuse