Rampant Corporatism: SCOTUS Justices Rule in Favor of Companies they Own Stock In, 90% of the Time

News Feed

Nearly 90 percent of the time, supreme court justices sided with businesses that filed ‘friend of the court’ briefs, a new report finds.
thefreethoughtproject.com

FOX NEWS EXECUTIVE MICHAEL CLEMENTE ALLOWED ALL 20 CANDIDATES TO PARTICIPATE IN DEBATE 8/6/2015, MR. MICHAEL CLEMENTE HAS RE-ESTABLISHED DEMOCRACY!

Republican presidential primary debate hosted by Fox News at 5 p.m. on Aug. 6, 2015 in Cleveland, Ohio.

Fox News executive Michael Clemente has sincerely practice democracy, by allowing all 20 GOP presidential candidates be heard and to participate in the debate, that was aired Thur., August 6, 2015. He was very respectful to the Voters of the United States.

Michael Clemente divided the debates into two to make it possible for ALL candidates to speak.

The announcement by Fox News executive Michael Clemente means low-polling candidates who might not make the 1% level.

Fox News is gifted to have an executive who my no means wants manipulate the voters. Thank you Mr. Michael Clemente.

It is a disgrace and a “terrible dishonor” to the United States of America and the people, when Walt Disney Co.-ABC Holding Co. that owns television network KABC7 and Owners NBC Universal NBC and NBC4LA television network, that purposely denied the voters to hear who were actually candidates on their televised in Los Angeles, CA for 2013 election.

Over 50 years ABC and NBC has been manipulating the voters and having the power to choose who ABC and NBC want to win and be heard.

In my opinion and research ABC and NBC television networks has over thrown the government with this unlawful and treason practice

Sometimes, I wonder do these JUDGES have interest or/stock in ABC and NBC, whereas the Judges allow these corporations “ABC and NBC” to violate the People of the United States.

Isn’t it a conflict of interest for a Judge to decide a case against a corporation, if the Judge has or had personal/financial dealings with the corporation(s)?

Mr. Michael Clemente please continue to honor the people will, thank you again. May GOD continue to bless you.

Sincerely from, Addie M. Miller

The following is a transcript of the Republican presidential primary debate hosted by Fox News at 5 p.m. on Aug. 6, 2015 in Cleveland, Ohio.

SPEAKERS:
Rk Candidate
1 Jeb Bush
2 Mike Huckabee
3 Scott Walker
4 Ted Cruz
5 Ben Carson
6 Rand Paul
8 Donald Trump
9 Chris Christie
10 John Kasich
Source: Real Clear Politics
Note: Numbers as of Aug 4, 2015. *Change in ranking from previous week
FORMER GOV. RICK PERRY, R-TEXAS
FORMER SEN. RICK SANTORUM, R-PA.
SEN. LINDSEY GRAHAM, R-S.C.
GOV. BOBBY JINDAL, R-LA.
CARLY FIORINA
FORMER GOV. JIM GILMORE, R-GA.
FORMER GOV. GEORGE PATAKI, R-N.Y.

INVESTIGATE ABUSES OF JUDICIAL IMMUNITY “PETITION BY CHANGE.ORG”

Investigate Abuses of Judicial Immunity
303
Supporters

Article III Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution states: The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their Offices during good Behaviour (emphasis added), and shall, at stated Times, receive for their Services, a Compensation, which shall not be diminished during their Continuance in Office.

In only two circumstances is a judge not immune from liability:

(1) for nonjudicial actions; and

(2) for actions, though judicial in nature, taken in complete absence of all jurisdiction.

Id. at 11-12; Schucker, 846 F. 2d at 1204.

Prosecutorial Immunity applies to the decision to prosecute a particular case; “This immunity covers the knowing use of false testimony at trial, the suppression of exculpatory evidence, and malicious prosecution.”

Milstein v. Cooley, 257 F. 3d 1004, 1008-09 (9th Cir. 2001).

An act done in complete absence of all jurisdiction cannot be a judicial act.

Piper v. Pearson, id., 2 Gray 120.

“It is no more than the act of a private citizen, pretending to have judicial power which does not exist at all. In such circumstances, to grant absolute judicial immunity is contrary to the public policy expectation that there shall be a Rule of Law.”

Application of immunity to judges who admitted under oath to engaging in a criminal scheme that lasted for years would indeed be “monstrous.” [Quoting Judge Learned Hand in Gregorie v. Biddle, 177 F.2d 579 (2d Cir. 1949)] To find immunity would denigrate the respect of the public for the judiciary, which is dependent upon judges making decisions based on the law and the facts, rather than personal, corrupt motives.

Whereby; the Tenth Amendment states: The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

We The People, hereby ask Congress to create a subcommittee to investigate and address the flagrant abuses of Judicial Immunity and Bad Behavior rampantly exerted by the Judicial Branch under the Color of Law.

Judicial Immunity is one of the reasons we are experiencing so much legal corruption. As long as judges are not accountable for their decisions as judges, the door to corruption is wide open, with many evil souls walking through.

“We hold these truths to be self evident, that all men are created equal” There are no out clauses, not even the judges. If I engage in corruption I am liable. If judges do, they are immune. How is that right by any standard other than evil? Now is the time to flush all forms of evil from our system. Know them by their fruits.

“That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.”

It’s time to restore integrity into our judicial system by holding the people responsible for the decisions that they make, just like any other citizen.

214 signatures are still needed!
J. Nayer Hardin just signed this petition on Change.org.

 

TREASON Committed by the “THE MEDIA ” in 1960 and 2013

TREASON Committed by the “THE MEDIA ” in 1960 and 2013

This is of National and International Importance
(U.S. military and US citizens living abroad Overseas).

By Addie M. Miller

For over a HALF A CENTURY, THE MEDIA has manipulated the United States America’s voters to see what they want people to see.

This is far beyond injustice, but actual TREASON nationally and internationally by perverting the People’s Will by withholding vital information in the voting process, like the full slate of candidates for any elected office.

For example, someone was born in 1960 they would be 55 years old.

Many never would had imagine the there were 2 other candidates besides Kennedy and Nixon in the 11/08/1960 presidential election which actually had a total of 4 candidates.

Yet the MEDIA controls the airwaves then 1960 and now 2015.

Also, many loyal U.S. men and women serving our country in the military are being deceive by the MEDIA until someone intercedes.

This must stop!

Allowing the CORPORATE CONTROLLED MEDIA to choose who the People know about and who they don’t know are running for elected office is voter manipulation.

VOTER MANIPULATION IS TREASON – GOING AGAINST THE VOTED WILL OF THE PEOPLE.

For democracy to function properly, the voting public must be fully informed. Manipulation, for the voting population of the United States, controls the country with lies.

In 2013 the MEDIA manipulated the people as to there were 5 mayoral candidates for the City of Los Angeles mayoral election, when in fact it was untrue.

Just like the 1960 presidential election and once again THE MEDIA acted High Treason to the voters who are citizens of the United States of America.

https://research.archives.gov/id/193235
CPD: 1960 Debates
http://www.debates.org/index.php?page=1960-debates

research.archives.gov

2017, United States, Elder Abuse