Tag Archives: AFL-CIO

Mayor Tom Bradley, was my Mentor, Adviser and Friend

Addie M. Miller

July 17, 2014 · 

Image may contain: 2 people, suit

Mayor Tom Bradley, was my Mentor, Adviser and Friend. His advise to me, “Give the people of all Cultures their needs for a better Whole Class City”

TOM BRADLEY 38th Mayor of Los Angeles, serving from 1973 to 1993 (20 years). He was my mentor, adviser and friend.
 
Addie M. Miller was a Scout for Mayor Tom Bradley for the betterment of City of Los Angeles.
(5). an act or instance of reconnoitering, inspecting, observing, etc.
 
Now the City of Los Angeles is filthy, polluted, massive crack sidewalks, pot holes throughout the city of Los Angeles “until if you drive a vehicle you may have to get the shock on your vehicle repair regularly”, cover up of contaminated soil with clean soil then the contaminated soil comes back after a rain.
 
Before Tom Bradley became the 38th MAYOR of the City of Los Angeles, he was a Police Officer for the Los Angeles Police Department and he was known for Walking and strolling through the streets of Los Angeles
 
During his service as a Police Officer he personally seen the turmoil and what the City was in need of. That’s when he decided to become Mayor and the Chief Executive Officer of Los Angeles and make Los Angeles a WORLD Class City.
 
In my opinion Tom Bradley was not a lavish person dressing in a suit a tie everyday and driving stylish automobiles.
 
Tom Bradley was a grass root public servant (LAPD Officer) and seen what the City of Los Angeles needed. Maybe that is why the Airport is name after him. Police officers sees all and knows the people in the City. Tom Bradley patrolled the City of Los Angeles “walking” when he was a Police Officer for the LAPD!!
See More
 
Advertisements

Civil and Political Rights are a Class of Rights that Protect Individuals’ Freedom from Unwarranted Infringement

“Civil rights” redirects here. For other uses, see Civil rights (disambiguation).

Civil and political rights are a class of rights that protect individualsfreedom from unwarranted infringement by governments and private organizations, and ensure one’s ability to participate in the civil and political life of the state without discrimination or repression.

Civil rights include the ensuring of peoples’ physical and mental integrity, life and safety; protection from discrimination on grounds such as race, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, national origin, color, ethnicity, religion, or disability;[1][2][3] and individual rights such as privacy, the freedoms of thought and conscience, speech and expression, religion, the press, assembly and movement.

For Referencehttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_and_political_rights

https://addiemmiller.wordpress.com/2018/07/11/a-supreme-court-justice-of-the-united-states-must-recuse-from-case-when-justices-has-financial-interest-in-case/
https://addiemmiller.wordpress.com/2018/07/10/injustice-in-my-opinion-the-supreme-court-of-the-united-states-cases-distributed-for-conference-were-not-being-treated-fairly-clerk-stated-justices-can-see-all-cases-in-one-day
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/economy/conflict-interest-supreme-court-justices-stocks
https://www.facebook.com/addie.m.miller/posts/1689305707854828
                            https://dockets.justia.com/docket/california/cacdce/2:2014cv06472/597116

Addie M. Miller v. Walt Disney Company Channel 7 KABC et al

Plaintiff: Addie M. Miller

Defendant: Walt Disney Company Channel 7 KABC and NBC4LA-Telemundo

Case Number: 2:2014cv06472

Filed: August 18, 2014

Court: California Central District Court

Presiding Judge: Unassigned

Referring Judge: Duty Magistrate Judge

Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other

MY CASE IS IN SUCH LARGE GROUP SCHEDULED FOR CONFERENCE AT THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES ON SEPTEMBER 29, 2014, “WILL MY CASE #13-9007 RECEIVE ‘FAIR ATTENTION AND A FAIR DECISION” BY THE 9 UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT JUSTICES??” (Read the following)

Today July 10, 2014 a 9:56 A.M. I telephoned the Supreme Court of the United States to inquire my concern regarding to the ‘numerous’ Distribution of Cases for Conference before the Justices on September 29, 2014.

A Supreme Court Justice Of The United States Must Recuse From Case When Justice(s) Has Financial Interest In Case

The Above Photo Are The 9 Supreme Court Justices to whom my CASE #13-9007 went before 7/21/2014 . 

My Case as the petitioner #13-9007 was Distributed For Conference in the Supreme Court Of The United States 4/23/2014 and was denied 7/21/2014.   

I personally telephoned the Supreme Court to ask that there were many, many cases schedules for Conference that day and did the Justices take time to review my CASE #13-9007. 

I have a question “Did the Justices take there time to actually review?”  After reading PBS.Org, I believe there is a conflict of interest with the Justice(s) and the Respondent as far as having stock in the Respondent’s corporation, then I believe the Justice should have recuse themselves from my case  #13-9007. 

In my opinion unfairness towards my case #13-9007 during the 7/21/2014 Justices Supreme Court Of The United States Conference.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=%2Fdocketfiles%2F13-9007.htm  A Justice(s) of the Supreme Court of the United States must recuse themselves from a case when the Justice(s) has financial interest a party. In my opinion when my case went before the Supreme Court their was a financial interest with the party I was suing. I also believe there was more than one justice and that is why my case was never heard.

Government of the people, by the people, for the people……- Abraham Lincoln

The Supreme Court Of The United States should not just be for the Rich Corporations.   Such a Great INJUSTICE.

The 9 Supreme Court Of The United States in the years 2013 , 2014 and 2015

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/special/politics/scotus-roundup-2013/?noredirect=on

The Supreme Court’s 2012-2013 term made history by striking down key elements of the Voting Rights Act and the Defense of Marriage Act, both in 5 to 4 decisions. The percentage of 5-to-4 split cases this session was the court’s highest since 2008, with Justice Anthony M. Kennedy most frequently voting with the majority. In the three major cases that ended the court’s term — affirmative action in higher education, the Voting Rights Act and the Defense of Marriage Act —Kennedy was the only justice in the majority each time.

Read related article.

INJUSTICE!! In My Opinion, The Supreme Court Of The United States “Cases Distributed for Conference Were Not being Treated Fairly. “Clerk” stated, “Justices can see all cases in one day”.

I ask the clerk is it possible for the Justices to review all these cases in ONE DAY? He answered YES.  My case did not receive Fair Attention and did Not Receive Fair Decision.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=%2Fdocketfiles%2F13-9007.htm

“JUSTICES” OF SUPREME COURT OF THE UNTIED STATES, MUST OBEY THE CONSTITUTION AND “NOT THEIR PERSONAL FRIENDS AND BUSINESS ACQUAINTANCES”, CONCERNING ANY CASE THAT COME BEFORE THE S.C.O.T.U.S.

https://www.myenglishpages.com/site…/random-idiom.php…
JUSTICE IS BLIND. “-This expression means that justice is impartial and objective. There is an allusion here to the Greek statue for justice, wearing a blindfold so as “not to treat friends differently from strangers”, or “rich people better than the poor ones.”

No automatic alt text available.

2018 Happy Independence Day

Remember what USA stands for. Peace Be Still. God loves and create all.

FACEBOOK ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF ADDIE M. MILLER’S EDUCATIONAL WRITINGS