Tag Archives: Twitter

Matthew McConaughey j.k. livin foundation and Lincoln MKZ Commercial https://youtu.be/4cwhDDM40Ng

Matthew McConaughey
Matthew McConaughey Lincoln Navigator Commercials, an American made product by the Ford Company   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8QEAA94FjHc
Matthew McConaughey.  Remember, in good times & bad times, now times & all time, just keep livin.

Matthew McConaughey is my favorite actor, he most of the time plays the defender for the least fortunate.

He also plays in brilliant commercials for a US American Manufacturer that Being the Ford Company. Keep doing your good work Matthew McConaughey 

Sincerely from,  Addie M. Miller
Image may contain: 37 people, people smiling, people sitting and indoor
Matthew McConaughey  photo at top with wearing a cap

With all our JKL programs up and running for the school year, I just wanted to thank all our incredible j.k. Livin Foundation teachers for what you do every day! Also, a Huge Thank You to Microsoft for hosting our National Teacher Training day this year at their Microsoft Lounge!

Advertisements

DERACINATION “Forced displacement”, Blacks in Los Angeles Are being forced to move out of Los Angeles, CA “REMOVAL OF PEOPLE FROM ONE AREA TO ANOTHER IS A CRIME AGAINST HUMANITY”

Afro-Americans/Blacks are victims of DERACINATION “forced Displacement” is taking place in the City of Los Angeles. REMOVAL OF PEOPLE FROM ONE AREA TO ANOTHER IS A CRIME AGAINST HUMANITY”

DERACINATION

Forced displacement or forced immigration is the coerced movement of a person or people away from their home or home region and it often connotes violent coercion. Someone who has experienced forced displacement is a “forced immigrant”, a “displaced person” (DP), rarely also a “displacee”, or if it is within the same country, an internally displaced person (IDP). In some cases the forced immigrant can also become a refugee, as that term has a specific legal definition. A specific form of forced displacement is population transfer, which is a coherent policy to move unwanted groups, for example, as an attempt at ethnic cleansing. Another form is deportation.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forced_displacement

 

           

Civil and Political Rights are a Class of Rights that Protect Individuals’ Freedom from Unwarranted Infringement

“Civil rights” redirects here. For other uses, see Civil rights (disambiguation).

Civil and political rights are a class of rights that protect individualsfreedom from unwarranted infringement by governments and private organizations, and ensure one’s ability to participate in the civil and political life of the state without discrimination or repression.

Civil rights include the ensuring of peoples’ physical and mental integrity, life and safety; protection from discrimination on grounds such as race, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, national origin, color, ethnicity, religion, or disability;[1][2][3] and individual rights such as privacy, the freedoms of thought and conscience, speech and expression, religion, the press, assembly and movement.

For Referencehttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_and_political_rights

https://addiemmiller.wordpress.com/2018/07/11/a-supreme-court-justice-of-the-united-states-must-recuse-from-case-when-justices-has-financial-interest-in-case/
https://addiemmiller.wordpress.com/2018/07/10/injustice-in-my-opinion-the-supreme-court-of-the-united-states-cases-distributed-for-conference-were-not-being-treated-fairly-clerk-stated-justices-can-see-all-cases-in-one-day
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/economy/conflict-interest-supreme-court-justices-stocks
https://www.facebook.com/addie.m.miller/posts/1689305707854828
                            https://dockets.justia.com/docket/california/cacdce/2:2014cv06472/597116

Addie M. Miller v. Walt Disney Company Channel 7 KABC et al

Plaintiff: Addie M. Miller

Defendant: Walt Disney Company Channel 7 KABC and NBC4LA-Telemundo

Case Number: 2:2014cv06472

Filed: August 18, 2014

Court: California Central District Court

Presiding Judge: Unassigned

Referring Judge: Duty Magistrate Judge

Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other

MY CASE IS IN SUCH LARGE GROUP SCHEDULED FOR CONFERENCE AT THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES ON SEPTEMBER 29, 2014, “WILL MY CASE #13-9007 RECEIVE ‘FAIR ATTENTION AND A FAIR DECISION” BY THE 9 UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT JUSTICES??” (Read the following)

Today July 10, 2014 a 9:56 A.M. I telephoned the Supreme Court of the United States to inquire my concern regarding to the ‘numerous’ Distribution of Cases for Conference before the Justices on September 29, 2014.

A Supreme Court Justice Of The United States Must Recuse From Case When Justice(s) Has Financial Interest In Case

The Above Photo Are The 9 Supreme Court Justices to whom my CASE #13-9007 went before 7/21/2014 . 

My Case as the petitioner #13-9007 was Distributed For Conference in the Supreme Court Of The United States 4/23/2014 and was denied 7/21/2014.   

I personally telephoned the Supreme Court to ask that there were many, many cases schedules for Conference that day and did the Justices take time to review my CASE #13-9007. 

I have a question “Did the Justices take there time to actually review?”  After reading PBS.Org, I believe there is a conflict of interest with the Justice(s) and the Respondent as far as having stock in the Respondent’s corporation, then I believe the Justice should have recuse themselves from my case  #13-9007. 

In my opinion unfairness towards my case #13-9007 during the 7/21/2014 Justices Supreme Court Of The United States Conference.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=%2Fdocketfiles%2F13-9007.htm  A Justice(s) of the Supreme Court of the United States must recuse themselves from a case when the Justice(s) has financial interest a party. In my opinion when my case went before the Supreme Court their was a financial interest with the party I was suing. I also believe there was more than one justice and that is why my case was never heard.

Government of the people, by the people, for the people……- Abraham Lincoln

The Supreme Court Of The United States should not just be for the Rich Corporations.   Such a Great INJUSTICE.

The 9 Supreme Court Of The United States in the years 2013 , 2014 and 2015

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/special/politics/scotus-roundup-2013/?noredirect=on

The Supreme Court’s 2012-2013 term made history by striking down key elements of the Voting Rights Act and the Defense of Marriage Act, both in 5 to 4 decisions. The percentage of 5-to-4 split cases this session was the court’s highest since 2008, with Justice Anthony M. Kennedy most frequently voting with the majority. In the three major cases that ended the court’s term — affirmative action in higher education, the Voting Rights Act and the Defense of Marriage Act —Kennedy was the only justice in the majority each time.

Read related article.

“JUSTICES” OF SUPREME COURT OF THE UNTIED STATES, MUST OBEY THE CONSTITUTION AND “NOT THEIR PERSONAL FRIENDS AND BUSINESS ACQUAINTANCES”, CONCERNING ANY CASE THAT COME BEFORE THE S.C.O.T.U.S.

https://www.myenglishpages.com/site…/random-idiom.php…
JUSTICE IS BLIND. “-This expression means that justice is impartial and objective. There is an allusion here to the Greek statue for justice, wearing a blindfold so as “not to treat friends differently from strangers”, or “rich people better than the poor ones.”

No automatic alt text available.

2018 Happy Independence Day

Remember what USA stands for. Peace Be Still. God loves and create all.

FACEBOOK ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF ADDIE M. MILLER’S EDUCATIONAL WRITINGS